History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hopkins v. Riggs
8 N.Y.S. 713
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1890
Check Treatment
Dykman, J.

There is no merit in this appeal. The action is for the recovery of damages for false and fraudulent representations, and depended entirely upon the evidence for its sustenance. The case was fairly submitted to the jury, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The facts are thus settled against the defendant; and the evidence was sufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and to sustain the verdict. The judgment and ■order denying a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Hopkins v. Riggs
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 12, 1890
Citation: 8 N.Y.S. 713
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In