Hopkins v. . Crisp
78 S.E. 275
N.C.1913Check Treatment(1) "Is the land claimed by plaintiffs, Tract No. 1949, located as shown on the plat, and as contended by plaintiffs? Answer: Yes.
From the judgment rendered, defendant appealed. We have examined the record in this case and considered the several assignments of error, and we find no reversible error. The controversy appears to be almost exclusively one of fact, and we think the court properly presented it to the jury.
No error.