History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hope v. . Peterson
172 N.C. 869
N.C.
1916
Check Treatment

The defendants filed a demurrer, which was overruled, and the defendants appealed. The defendant moves in this Court to dismiss the action because it is brought in the name of the father and not by the executor or administrator of the son, and the motion must be sustained.

The case of Killian v. R. R., 128 N.C. 261, decides the exact question in favor of the defendant.

Action dismissed.

Cited: Hinnant v. Power Co., 189 N.C. 122 (c); Brown v. R. R.,202 N.C. 262 (c); White v. Comrs. of Johnston, 217 N.C. 333 (1).

Case Details

Case Name: Hope v. . Peterson
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 11, 1916
Citation: 172 N.C. 869
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.