midpage

Hope v. LipkinHope v. Lipkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Oct 15, 1963
No. 63-544
Reporters:
Before:
Barkdull
PER CURIAM.

The right to attorneys’ fees is derivative in nature when representing the wife in a divorce action. See: Smith v. Smith, 90 Fla. 824, 107 So. 257. Counsel for the wife have attempted to take an appeal in their individual names and not on behalf of the wife. Never having been parties of record in the trial court, they have no standing to prosecute such an appeal. See: Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608, 39 So. 48; King v. Brown, Fla.1951, 55 So.2d 187; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 55. Therefore, same is hereby dismissed,

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hope v. Lipkin
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 15, 1963
Citations: 156 So. 2d 659; No. 63-544
Docket Number: No. 63-544
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In