History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hooper v. Power
12 N.Y.2d 764
NY
1962
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N Y 2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion. '

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Feoessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Case Details

Case Name: Hooper v. Power
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 1, 1962
Citation: 12 N.Y.2d 764
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.