midpage

Hooks v. Trinity Food ServicesHooks v. Trinity Food Services

District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 4, 2026
2:26-cv-01126

ORDER

According to the Clark County Detention Center inmate database, Plaintiff is no longer at the address listed with the Court. Under Nevada Local Rule of Practice IA 3-1, a “pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party‘s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.” Nev. Loc. R. IA 3-1. When Plaintiff initiated this case, the Court sent him an advisory letter with information about the legal process. (ECF No. 2.) That letter warned Plaintiff that this case could be dismissed if he failed to immediately notify the Court of any change of address. (Id. at 1.)

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff‘s has until September 3, 2026, to file his current address with the Court.

Plaintiff is cautioned that this action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order. A dismissal without prejudice allows Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case number, when Plaintiff can provide the Court with his current address.

DATED: August 4, 2026

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: Hooks v. Trinity Food Services
Court Name: District Court, D. Nevada
Date Published: Aug 4, 2026
Citation: 2:26-cv-01126
Docket Number: 2:26-cv-01126
Court Abbreviation: D. Nev.
Log In