History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hooks v. State
656 So. 2d 624
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1995
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court did not comply with the requirements of section 921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(18)(A), in imposing an upward departure sentence. We vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines.

*625SENTENCE VACATED and CAUSE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

BOOTH, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hooks v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 3, 1995
Citation: 656 So. 2d 624
Docket Number: No. 95-396
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.