Defendant was indicted and tried for the offense of aggravated assault. A mistrial resulted when the jurors could not reach a verdict. On his next trial he was convicted and sentenced to 10 years. Defendant appeals. Held:
1. Defendant’s first contention is that he had an affray with another in a restaurant and since the "victim” of the alleged aggravated assault had plead guilty to the offense of affray, the evidence was insufficient to convict him of a provoked assault on the victim with a deadly weapon (a knife). But the plea of guilty of the victim to the offense of affray is insufficient to demand a finding that this defendant was not guilty of aggravated assault. The mere fact that the defendant did not initiate the fight does not necessarily show that he was not guilty of aggravated assault with a knife, a deadly weapon. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. See
Geiger v. State,
2. A retrial following a mistrial caused by a failure of the jury to agree on a verdict is not a case of double jeopardy in this state. See in this connection
Bush v. State,
3. Further, defendant failed to offer a plea of former jeopardy before going to trial. A plea of former jeopardy is a personal privilege and may be waived. See Key
v. State,
4. There is no merit in any of the errors enumerated.
Judgment affirmed.
