19 S.E.2d 927 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1942
1. Conviction of shooting at another was authorized by evidence.
2. Omission, in absence of appropriate request, to elaborate the charge as to impeachment of witnesses was not cause for new trial.
2. The defendant contends that there was proof that a witness for the State had been convicted of simple larceny; and that although the judge charged on the law of impeachment of witnesses by proof of general bad character, he should have gone further and elaborated on the effect of the conviction of simple larceny in so *292
far as it related to impeachment of the witness. There was no request to charge, and the omission so to charge was not cause for a new trial. Branch v. Bishop,
Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur.