Hood v. Southern Railway Co.
139 Ga. 145 | Ga. | 1912
1. While certain documentary evidence tending to show the width of the defendant company’s right of way remote from the place at which its agents were constructing a side-track, the act against which an injunction was sought, was irrelevant, it was not of sufficient materiality to require a reversal of the judgment of the court below.
2. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing the interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
