Hood v. Hood

83 N.J. Eq. 695 | N.J. | 1914

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kadiscii, Black, Bogert, Vre-

DENBURGH, IÍEPPENHEIMER, WlLLÍAMS-12.

For reversal — None.

midpage