History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hood & Robinson v. Ware
34 Ga. 328
Ga.
1866
Check Treatment
Walker, J.

[1.] In this casé the testimony clearly established the employment of plaintiffs by defendant; for he adopted the papers prepared by them, and was recognized as counsel by the counsel of libellant.

[2.] The uneontradicted evidence in the cause, was that “ the services rendered were worth one hundred and fifty or two hundred dollars.” The verdict was for twenty-five dollars. Being decidedly against, not only the weight, but of all the evidence on this question, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial granted.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hood & Robinson v. Ware
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1866
Citation: 34 Ga. 328
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.