History
  • No items yet
midpage
Honeyman v. Hanan
271 N.Y. 662
NY
1936
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court. The plaintiff contended that chapter 794 of the Laws of the State of New York, enacted in 1933, as amended (Sections 1083-a and 1083-b of Civil Practice Act), impair the obligations of contracts, and thus violate article 1, section 10, of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that such laws do not violate said provision of article 1, section 10, of the Constitution of the United States." (See 271 N.Y. 564.)

Case Details

Case Name: Honeyman v. Hanan
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 5, 1936
Citation: 271 N.Y. 662
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.