History
  • No items yet
midpage
Homans v. Coombe
12 F. Cas. 444
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1828
Check Treatment
THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

was of opinion that the issue must be found for the garnishee: 1st. Because Act Md. 1791, e. 45, § 10, gives a remedy in rem only, and this is a proceeding in per-sonam; and if the issue be found for the plaintiff, the defendant will be personally liable. 2d. Because the deed of trust under which the garnishee claims, was a legal in-cumbrance, made prior to the commencement of the plaintiff’s claim to the lien, which commmeneed only at the time of the recording of the contract. The plaintiff became nonsuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Homans v. Coombe
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1828
Citation: 12 F. Cas. 444
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.