51 Iowa 383 | Iowa | 1879
The facts in the case at bar are that the defendant was the owner of the legal title at the time the judgment was rendered and sale made. The judgments were liens thereon. It is clear, therefore, the case is not brought within the statute.
The appellants, however, insist the rule is that the sale will be set aside when the purchaser does not obtain anything of value, and, in support of this proposition, cite Chambers v. Cochran et al., 18 Iowa, 159; Preston v. Harrison, 9 Ind., 1; and Cowles, Ex’r, v. Bacon, 21 Conn., 451.
These cases only go to the extent of holding that the sale will be set aside if the-debtor had no title or interest. The question of the debtor having the legal title or'an apparent interest, or whether such interest was probably valuable or otherwise, was not considered. By their purchase the plaintiffs obtained all the right, title and interest of the defendant, including his right of redemption. Defendant had a fee simple title. It is true it had been sold under executions based on judgments which had priority to the plaintiffs’. The property was also incumbered by other liens which were
Affirmed.