History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holton v. State
29 Ga. App. 387
Ga. Ct. App.
1923
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a ground of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of documentary evidence, cannot be considered, where the documentary evidence is not set forth in -the ground nor attached as an exhibit thereto. This ruling disposes of the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, the alleged newly discovered evidence is-merely impeaching in its character, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Holton v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 11, 1923
Citation: 29 Ga. App. 387
Docket Number: 14056
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.