History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holton v. Patterson
49 Fla. 178
Fla.
1905
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In this cause the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Shackleford and Mi*. Justice Carter are of opinion that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice IIocker and Mr. Justice Cockrell are of opinion that it should be reversed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. ..... 37 South. Rep. 51, and Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. .... 37 South. Rep. 742, an order will be entered affirming the judgment from which the writ of error was taken.

Case Details

Case Name: Holton v. Patterson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jan 15, 1905
Citation: 49 Fla. 178
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.