History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holton v. Nelson
92 Minn. 305
Minn.
1904
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Action to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey land. The contract was in writing. The defense to the action was that the defendant was deceived, and did not understand the terms and provisions of the writing. The question raised by this defense was submitted to the jury under fair instructions, and they found a verdict *306for defendant. The assignments of error present, in substance, the question whether the evidence sustains the verdict. An examination of the evidence returned to this court leads to the conclusion, though not without some hesitation, that the verdict of the jury is sufficiently supported.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Holton v. Nelson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jun 3, 1904
Citation: 92 Minn. 305
Docket Number: Nos. 13,917—(53)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.