History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holt v. City of Mobile
1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 272
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

The only question presented on the record is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to authorize the judgment of conviction. There was some evidence tending to show that the defendant was in charge of the place where the officers found liquor stored, and in a building that was not used exclusively for a dwelling, Jones v. Montgomery, ante, p. 357, 77 So. 969; Conner v. State, ante, p. 452, 78 So. 715; Holt v. State, ante, p. 399, 78 So. 315.

The testimony was given ore tenus before the court, sitting without a jury, and we are unable to say from the evidence in the record that the conclusion of the trial court is plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Union Mut. Aid Ass'n of Mobile v. Carroway, 201 Ala. 414,78 So. 792; Smith v. Thomas, 201 Ala. 442, 78 So. 820; Mulligan v. State, 15 Ala. App. 204, 72 So. 761.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Holt v. City of Mobile
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 26, 1918
Citation: 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 272
Docket Number: 1 Div. 258.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.