Holmes v. State
233 S.E.2d 63
Ga. Ct. App.1977Check TreatmentThe defendant was convicted of selling heroin. His-defense was that of alibi. Held:
1. Defendant attacks the charge on alibi as being burden shifting. The trial court charged’ on alibi in substantially the same language as a charge that was approved by the Supreme Court in Mills v. State, 236 Ga. 364 (223 SE2d 724).
2. The evidence authorized the conviction.
Judgment affirmed.
