Holmes v. StateHolmes v. State
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas Gurnick, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant‘s conviction for trafficking in cocaine in violation of
We note that the initial stop of appellant on the Florida Turnpike was for improper display of a temporary vehicle tag. When the officers first saw appellant‘s car, no tag was visible on the rear of the vehicle.
We find no error in the admission in evidence of the cash found on appellant at the time of his arrest. Unlike Ferguson v. State, 697 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), which involved the charge of simple possession of 1.6 grams of cocaine, in this case the cash was relevant to corroborate appellant‘s statement that he had been given cash by someone in Jacksonville to buy a large amount of cocaine in Miami. See also Ezell v. State, 648 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
As to the remaining issue, we observe that Officer Lumpkin‘s stop of the vehicle was at the direction of Trooper Coker, who was within his authority to make a stop for a traffic infraction. See Sims v. State, 425 So. 2d 563, 568 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Gillis v. State, 634 So. 2d 725, 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.