Holmes v. Crane
176 A.D. 914 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1917
Order affirmed, with ten dolr Jars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.; Smith, J., dissented on the ground that the statute
See Code Civ. Proc. § 1836a, as added by Laws of 1911, chap. 631.— [Rep,