History
  • No items yet
midpage
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.
372 U.S. 710
SCOTUS
1963
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 15, 1963
Citation: 372 U.S. 710
Docket Number: 70 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.