History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holmes v. Bronson
43 Mich. 562
Mich.
1880
Check Treatment
Graves, J.

We are unable to make any distinction in principle between this case and Morrison v. Berry 42 Mich. 389.

Bo far as any difference is discoverable in the- facts, it is not to the advantage of the plaintiffs in error. And see Newcomb v. Andrews 41 Mich. 518; Vanneman v. Powers 56 N. Y. 39; Woodruff Iron Works v. Adams 37 Conn. 233; Wright v. Hood 49 Wis. 235.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Holmes v. Bronson
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 9, 1880
Citation: 43 Mich. 562
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.