History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holmes v. Bronaugh
266 U.S. 592
SCOTUS
1925
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 245 U. S. 162; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6.

Case Details

Case Name: Holmes v. Bronaugh
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 5, 1925
Citation: 266 U.S. 592
Docket Number: No. 494
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.