History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holmes v. Bi-State Development Agency
2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 80
Mo. Ct. App.
2007
Check Treatment
218 S.W.3d 477 (2007)

Tim HOLMES, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, d/b/a Metro, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 87920.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

January 16, 2007.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 20, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2007.

Rick A. Courtney, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Denis C. Burns, Amanda L. Hazleton, Burns, Vandover & Godfrey, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tim Holmes (Holmes) appeals from a trial court judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Bi-State Development Agency, d/b/a Metro, (Bi-State) on Holmes' petition for damages for negligence. Holmes was injured by a car after he fell in the roadway subsequent to exiting a Bi-State bus at a designated bus stop. Holmes alleges trial court error in ruling that Bi-State did not have a duty to make the bus stop safe and in excluding certain testimony based on that ruling.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Holmes v. Bi-State Development Agency
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 16, 2007
Citation: 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 80
Docket Number: ED 87920
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.