History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holloway v. Stant USA Corp
5:17-cv-00016
E.D. Ark.
Sep 12, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION NORA HOLLOWAY PLAINTIFF v. No. 5:17-cv-16-DPM

STANT USA CORP., and

PATRICK FENTON DEFENDANTS

ORDER The circumstances are unique. Holloway made many claims against Stant, among them a FLSA retaliatory-firing claim. In discovery, Holloway acknowledged that she had no solid evidence supporting this claim, and thus abandoned it. NQ 12-1at2-3. She made no claim for overtime or unpaid wages under either federal or state law. Now Holloway and Stant propose to settle the case. Must the Court evaluate the deal, as it would in the usual FLSA case involving wage and overtime claims? No. In this unusual weave of circumstances, the Court doesn't have to be involved. Holloway's FLSA claim, which seems to have been no more than zealous pleading that covered all potential claims, dropped out of the case approximately three months *2 ago. The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. Motion to reconsider, NQ 12, granted.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Case Details

Case Name: Holloway v. Stant USA Corp
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Date Published: Sep 12, 2017
Docket Number: 5:17-cv-00016
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.