midpage

Hollis v. StateHollis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 29, 1969
No. 41839
Reporters:
,
Before:
Belcher

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment was assessed at ten ‍​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍years which was probated.

The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C. P., in that he did not file a brief in the ‍​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍trial court “(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of ‍​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 *342S.W.2d 412; ‍​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

There is no showing of indigency.

Nothing appears in the record which should be considered as unassigned ‍​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Hollis v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 29, 1969
Citations: 436 S.W.2d 341; 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932; No. 41839
Docket Number: No. 41839
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
Log In