History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hollis v. Brown
159 Pa. 539
Pa.
1894
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. Assuming, as we must, for the purposes of this appeal, that all the averments contained in the affidavit of defence are true, there is nothing in them that amounts to a defence to the plaintiff’s case.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hollis v. Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 29, 1894
Citation: 159 Pa. 539
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 129
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.