History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holliday v. Steele
65 Tex. 388
Tex.
1886
Check Treatment
Robertson, Associate Justice.

defendant in error recovered a judgment by default against the plaintiffs in error. The return upon the citation is in the following words: “Came to hand on the twelfth day of February, A. D. 1884, at 11 o’clock a. m., and executed the eighteenth day of February, A. D. 1884, by delivering to *389Mrs. A. A. Holliday and W. H. Holliday, the within named defendants, in person, a true copy of this writ.” This language is almost identical with that of the return held to be insufficient in the case of King v. Goodson, 42 Tex. 153, and, on that authority, the service must be held to be bad. In the statement of the sheriff’s costs, at the end of the transcript, fees for delivering two citations are charged, but we do not think this cures the defect in the return. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

[Opinion delivered January 29, 1886.]

Case Details

Case Name: Holliday v. Steele
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 29, 1886
Citation: 65 Tex. 388
Docket Number: Case No. 2192
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.