History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holliday v. Spencer
7 Ind. 632
Ind.
1856
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Answer, that the mortgage was given to secure to the mortgagee *633the purchase-money of the land mortgaged, which land was sold by the mortgagee to the mortgagor, and that the seller had no title. Replication. Issue. Trial. Decree of foreclosure.

E. H. Brackett, for the appellant. B. C. Gregory and R. Jones, for the appellee.

The only objection made to the decree is, that the Common Pleas had no jurisdiction, because the title to real estate was in issue. The case falls within the principle of Wolcott v. Wigton et al., ante, p. 44; and under it, if to be adhered to, the decree below must be affirmed. And even if that case were wrong, a later statute confers unqualified jurisdiction upon the Common Pleas to foreclose mortgages. 2 R. S., p. 176, s. 631.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Holliday v. Spencer
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 14, 1856
Citation: 7 Ind. 632
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.