History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holliday v. Griffith Bros. & West
34 S.E. 126
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, P. J.

1. When it appears that a contract has been reduced to writing and duly executed, it is erroneous to admit, over proper objection, parol evidence as to its contents; and proving by parol what a given writing does not contain is as much forbidden as proving in this manner what it does contain.

2. The court below erred in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Holliday v. Griffith Bros. & West
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 26, 1899
Citation: 34 S.E. 126
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.