History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hollander v. Hollander
232 A.D. 664
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment

Order affirmed. The defenses are sufficiently broad to permit the defendant to show that the plaintiff has refused to resume marital relations with the defendant since the repudiation of the separation agreement. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74.) Present —• Dowling, P. J., Finch, MeAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Hollander v. Hollander
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1931
Citation: 232 A.D. 664
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.