History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hollander v. Biscayne Cove
546 So. 2d 739
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with the trial court that “[t]he Plaintiff breached the Agreement for Purchase and Sale with the Defendant, BISCAYNE COVE, and following Plaintiffs breach said Defendant was under no obligation to do anything further regarding the Contract for Purchase and Sale,” we affirm the final judgment.

We reverse, however, the trial court’s order denying Biscayne Cove attorney’s fees. “A post-judgment motion for attorney’s fees raises a ‘collateral and independent claim’ which the trial court has continuing jurisdiction to entertain within a reasonable time,” Finkelstein v. North Broward Hosp. Dist., 484 So.2d 1241, 1243 (Fla.1986), notwithstanding the trial court’s failure to reserve jurisdiction to award fees, Finkelstein, and the requesting party’s failure to plead entitlement to them. Autorico, Inc. v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 398 So.2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part; remanded to the trial court for a determination and award of appropriate attorney’s fees.

Case Details

Case Name: Hollander v. Biscayne Cove
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 6, 1989
Citation: 546 So. 2d 739
Docket Number: Nos. 88-2397, 88-1521
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.