Case Information
*1 Case 5:25-cv-00233-JD Document 8 Filed 03/11/25 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MICHAEL HOLLAND, an individual, )
) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-00233-JD
) JUSTIN KUTZ, an individual; )
CHRISTOPHER BALESTRINO, an )
individual; CROSS COUNTRY )
EXPRESS, LLC, a Wisconsin limited )
liability company; and MADISON ONE )
CAPITAL, LLC, a Nevada limited )
liability company, )
) Defendants. ) ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”). [Doc. No. 3]. The Motion seeks a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction against Defendants. It was filed in connection with the original complaint.
Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1). [Doc. No. 5]. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint “supersedes the original [complaint] and renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp. , 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc. , 793 F.3d 1177, 1180–81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers , 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). Thus, the Motion is moot.
The Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [Doc.
Case 5:25-cv-00233-JD Document 8 Filed 03/11/25 Page 2 of 2 No. 3] is DENIED as moot and without prejudice to resubmission. Plaintiff should, however, satisfy the Court it has subject-matter jurisdiction before refiling.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of March 2025. 2
