History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holland v. . Isler
77 N.C. 1
N.C.
1877
Check Treatment

The plaintiffs are the mayor, commissioners, and tax collectors of the town of Goldsboro.

The defendants are lawyers and physicians residing in said town, who resist the payment of a monthly tax assessed by the plaintiffs under the power granted in the charter of said town.

His Honor held that plaintiffs had a right to impose and collect the said tax. Judgment. Appeal by defendants. The Constitution provides that "the General Assembly may tax trades, professions," etc. Art. V, sec. 3. The General Assembly has authorized the town of Goldsboro "to lay and collect a monthly tax on lawyers, physicians," etc. Pr. Laws 1866. *Page 18

The defendants are lawyers and physicians in the town of Goldsboro, and the town has laid a tax upon them which they refuse to pay. This would seem to make a clear case against the defendants.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited:. Wilmington v. Macks, 86 N.C. 90; Winston v. Taylor, 99 N.C. 213;S. v. Danenberg, 151 N.C. 720; Guano Co. v. New Bern, 158 N.C. 356.

Case Details

Case Name: Holland v. . Isler
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1877
Citation: 77 N.C. 1
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.