125 Ark. 10 | Ark. | 1916
(after stating the facts.)
The undisputed testimony shows that no notice of dissatisfaction as to the condition or performance of the stalhon was given to the seller until long after the time designated in the contract for his return in accordance with the terms of the contract, if he should prove unsatisfactory and not as warranted, nor was any attempt made to return him and receive another in his place in accordance with the terms of the contract. It was likewise undisputed •that the purchasers did not insure the stallion in accordance with the agreement that they might do so in the contract of guaranty and had no claim against the seller on that account.
Since the testimony does not disclose that the makers on the note had any legal defense thereto, the court likewise erred in not directing a verdict for appellant.
The judgment is reversed and judgment will be entered here in appellant’s favor, for the amount of the notes sued on. It is so ordered.