History
  • No items yet
midpage
799 N.E.2d 538
Ind.
2003

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

RUCKER, Justice.

Ronnie Holden seeks rehearing of our opinion in which we declared that Article 1, Section 19 of the Indiana Constitution does not amount to a constitutionally permissible form of jury nullification. Holden v. State, 788 N.E.2d 1253 (Ind.2003). Among other things Holden complains that we failed to address several issues raised before and decided by the Court of Appeals, whose Memorandum Decision was vacated onee transfer was granted. Holden is correct. We therefore grant rehearing to summarily affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals on all issues except those addressed in our initial opinion. See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A)(2). In all other respects the petition for rehearing is denied.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, SULLIVAN and BOEHM, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Holden v. State
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 3, 2003
Citations: 799 N.E.2d 538; 2003 Ind. LEXIS 1022; 2003 WL 22852892; 49S02-0202-CR-153
Docket Number: 49S02-0202-CR-153
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In