unks/2488-b3a7aea7d0f8c8b4.js","6493","static/chunks/6493-daf5e2d1f997cb3d.js","9820","static/chunks/app/(tabs)/@document/document/%5Bslug%5D/page-12e3ba612f833c9d.js"],"OpinionContainer"] 1c:[["$","meta","0",{"name":"viewport","content":"width=device-width, initial-scale=1"}],["$","meta","1",{"charSet":"utf-8"}],["$","title","2",{"children":"Holcomb v. Copeland, 118 S.W.2d 932"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"description","content":"\n Read Holcomb v. Copeland, 118 S.W.2d 932 (Tex. App. 1938) for free with midpage's AI-powered interface. Search through and read midpage's comprehensive database of legal opinions.\n "}],["$","link","4",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/holcomb-v-copeland-3971343"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"google-site-verification","content":"47d9HJfzq2q0OP3ZqpopFxgpQIsT0oBkwtraeH2SIpE"}],["$","link","6",{"rel":"icon","href":"/midpage.png"}]] 5:null a:null 21:T474,

Plaintiffs in error having filed no briefs upon this writ of error, the same is *933 dismissed for want of prosecution. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co.,118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

118 S.W.2d 932 | Tex. App. | 1938