52 F. 871 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York | 1892
The orator is a well-known maker of harmonicas in Wurtemberg, most of which are sold under his name in this country. Ernest Leiterd is a maker of harmonicas in Saxony, for whom, in the sale of which, the defendant is agent in this country. Leiterd has made harmonicas, and put upon them "the word “nach” with the words “Improved Hohner” in larger letters, prominently, besides his own name, partly in monogram, and less plain, which have been and are being sold through the defendant in this country. This bill is brought to restrain such use of the orator’s name, and for other relief. The orator does not appear to have made or sold any particular style of these instruments to which his name has been applied, but his workmanship appears to have been good, and his name has generally been used upon those of his own manufacture. He has made no improvements but in quality, and the words “Improved Hohner” would signify his make of better quality.
The defendant Leiterd has no occasion to use the orator’s name to distinguish any form of instrument, or for any purpose but to express his workmanship. The use of the word “nach” would not show that the instruments were not his make; neither would the name of Leiterd show that they were of his make. This use of the orator’s name tends directly to show that Leiterd’s instruments are of the orator’s make. Many cases justify the use of others’ names to show kinds and styles, but none of them go so far as this. Fairbanks v. Jacobus, 14 Blatchf. 337; Wilcox Machine Co. v. Frame, 17 Fed. Rep. 623; Leclanche Battery Co. v. Western Electric Co., 23 Fed. Rep. 276; Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove Manuf’g Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U. S. 598, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 166. The orator has the right to use his own name on his own wares. The defendant has shown no right to use the orator’s name on Leiterd’s wares. Let there be a decree for an injunction against this use of the orator’s name, and for an account, with costs.