Hoffmann v. Stoll, 748 P.2d 180

Hoffmann v. Stoll

748 P.2d 180

Or. Ct. App.

1988

Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).

Newman, J., dissenting.

Dissenting Opinion

NEWMAN, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated by ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍Warren, J., in his dissent in Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 348, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).