History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoffmann v. Stoll
748 P.2d 180
Or. Ct. App.
1988
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).

Newman, J., dissenting.





Dissenting Opinion

NEWMAN, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated by Warren, J., in his dissent in Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 348, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).

Case Details

Case Name: Hoffmann v. Stoll
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jan 13, 1988
Citation: 748 P.2d 180
Docket Number: 8611-07067; CA A44238
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.