History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoffman v. Whelan
160 Pa. 94
Pa.
1894
Check Treatment
■Pee Curiam,

There was no error in refusing to enter judgment against •the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

In his statement of claim, plaintiff alleges that the assessments, which he seeks to collect, were levied for the purpose ■of paying the death losses of certain specified horses. In substance, the affidavit of defence denies the existence of any such indebtedness, and avers that at the time said assessments were made there was no such indebtedness by the company, nor is there now, and that the very claims for which said assessments were made have been paid. Assuming, as we must for the purposes of this case, that these averments are true, they con■stitute a substantial traverse of the plaintiff’s claim as presented ■in his statement.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoffman v. Whelan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 26, 1894
Citation: 160 Pa. 94
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 122
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.