History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoffman v. Hoffman
266 A.D. 724
N.Y. App. Div.
1943
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The defendant failed to demand judgment for the return of the chattels in accordance with sections 1119 and 1124 of the Civil Practice Act. Under these circumstances the court could do no more than direct judgment dismissing the complaint with statutory costs to the defendant. (Levy v. Hohweisner, 101 App. Div. 82.)

The judgment and order should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present—Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment and order unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoffman v. Hoffman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 22, 1943
Citation: 266 A.D. 724
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.