Hoffman v. Apgar

115 N.J. Eq. 171 | N.J. | 1934

Pee Cueiam.

■The decree appealed from will bé-affirmed, for the’ reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by'Yiée-Cháncellor Buchanan, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 233, sub nom. Apgar v. Hoffman.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teehchabd, Pábkeb, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Hehee, Peeskie, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.