History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoff v. State
466 So. 2d 1252
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1985
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In this appeal appellant attacks the court’s refusal to suppress the seizure of *1253cocaine found in his possession. However, we dismiss the appeal because appellant failed to show that upon his plea of nolo contendere he reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. Skinner v. State, 399 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

In passing we note that the minutes of the criminal court book show that the court withheld adjudication of appellant and sentenced him to probation. The court issued an order withholding adjudication, but also issued a judgment and sentence adjudicating appellant guilty. Therefore, this dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) seeking to have the judgment and sentence conformed to the disposition which the judge pronounced in open court. See Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoff v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 12, 1985
Citation: 466 So. 2d 1252
Docket Number: No. 84-589
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.