History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoey v. Cloud
33 Misc. 764
N.Y. App. Term.
1900
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There is not sufficient evidence in this ease to support a finding either that the petitioner had obtained a renewal of the lease of the' premises in question from her lessor or that a renewal agreement was executed between the petitioner and her sub-tenant. While there is slight evidence relating to negotiations between the petitioner and a representative of her lessor, yet it does not appear that the agreement was consummated, and the verdict of the jury is without evidence to support it. .

Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekmak, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoey v. Cloud
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1900
Citation: 33 Misc. 764
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.