History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hodgdon v. Chase
32 Me. 169
Me.
1850
Check Treatment
Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—This is an action of singular type. It has been argued by the plaintiffs’ counsel with much ingenuity and force. But we think the reasoning cannot prevail. To maintain such an action would render the statute inoperative, except to change the form of actions from assumpsit to case or tort. Demurrer held good.

Case Details

Case Name: Hodgdon v. Chase
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1850
Citation: 32 Me. 169
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.