History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hodella v. State
158 Fla. 94
Fla.
1946
Check Treatment

Appellant being informed against for the crime of murder in the second degree, was convicted of manslaughter and perfected her appeal to this court.

The burden of appellant's contention is that the evidence showed that the appellant was either guilty of murder in the first degree or guilty of nothing more than justifiable homicide.

We entertain the view that the evidence was sufficient to have sustained a conviction of murder in the first degree and it, therefore, was sufficient to sustain a conviction of any lesser degree of unlawful homicide. See Ammons v. State,88 Fla. 444, 102 So. 642; Morrison v. State, 42 Fla. 149, 28 So. 97; Owens v. State, 65 Fla. 483, 62 So. 651; Stone v. State,57 Fla. 28, 48 So. 996; Dedge v. State, 68 Fla. 240, 67 So. 43; Johnson v. State, 24 Fla. 162, 4 So. 535, approved and distinguished in Marshall v. State, 32 Fla. 462, 14 So. 92; Brown v. State, 31 Fla. 207, 12 So. 640.

No reversible error being made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN, J., and BARNS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hodella v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Nov 1, 1946
Citation: 158 Fla. 94
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.