History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hobart Corporation v. The Dayton Power and Light Company
3:13-cv-00115
S.D. Ohio
Sep 23, 2019
Check Treatment
Docket

*1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

HOBART CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v.

THE DAYTON POWER &; LIGHT COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

C Case No. 3:13-cv-115 JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

ORDER OVERRULING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. SWIATOSLAV KACZMAR (DOC. #987), FRANKLIN IRON AND METAL CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF EXNER AND WHITE (DOC. #1001) AND SECOND MOTION OF DEFENDANT FRANKLIN IRON AND METAL CORPORATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #867)

Given the ongoing settlement discussions between Plaintiffs and Defendant Franklin Iron and Metal Corporation ("FI&;M"), the parties have asked the Court, on several occasions, to reserve ruling on their pending motions. The Court therefore OVERRULES the following motions WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing should the parties fail to reach a settlement agreement: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Swiatoslav Kaczmar, Doc. #987; (2) Franklin Iron and Metal Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Exner and White, Doc. #1001; and (3) Second Motion of Franklin Iron and Metal Corporation for Summary Judgment, Doc. #867.

*2 Date: September 23, 2019

WALTER H. RICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: Hobart Corporation v. The Dayton Power and Light Company
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Date Published: Sep 23, 2019
Docket Number: 3:13-cv-00115
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.