History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoang Minh Le v. Doe, dba Jade House Seafood and BBQ Restaurant
5:16-cv-02271
| C.D. Cal. | May 15, 2018
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 PAMELA TSAO (SBN: 266734) ASCENSION LAW GROUP 17802 Irvine Blvd. Suite A117 Tustin, CA 92780 PH: 714.783.4220 FAX: 888.505.1033 Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com JS-6 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Attorneys for Plaintiff HOANG MINH LE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HOANG MINH LE, an individual, Case No.: 5:16-cv-02271-RGK-DTB

Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF HOANG MINH LE AGAINST DEFENDANTS vs.

GIANG GUO QI, an individual dba “JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD & BBQ RESTAURANT”; and GANG WANG, an individual dba “JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD & BBQ RESTAURANT”; ROIC DBTC, LLC, a limited liability company, [Hon. R. Gary Klausner presiding ]

Defendants. *2 1

2

On May 7, 2018, the Court entered an order granting plaintiff HOANG MINH 3 LE’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment against GIANG GUO QI, an individual 4 dba “JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD & BBQ RESTAURANT”; and GANG WANG, an 5 individual dba “JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD & BBQ RESTAURANT”; (collectively, 6 “Defendants”). Consequently, 7 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

8 1. That Plaintiff recover $4,000.00 in statutory damages under the Unruh Civil 9 Rights Act from Defendant;

10 2. That Plaintiff recover $600.00 in attorney’s fees from Defendant; 11 3. That Plaintiff recover $540.00 in costs from Defendants; 12 4. That Defendants are enjoined to ensure that accessible barriers at the 13 Property 1126 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA 91765 from which 14 the business “Jade House Seafood” operates (the “Property”) are removed 15 and/or corrected, including but not limited to ensuring that restrooms at the 16 Property are accessible, as specified under the law; 5. That the action be, and is hereby dismissed. Hon. R. Gary Klausner District Court Judge *3 PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NAME: Le vs. Doe, dba JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD AND BBQ, et al. CASE NUMBER: 5:16-CV-02271-RGK-DTB I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age

of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 17802 Irvine Blvd Suite 117, Tustin, CA 92780

On May 15, 2018, I served the foregoing document described as:

in this action by transmitting a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

GIANG GUO QI, an individual dba “JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD & BBQ RESTAURANT”; GANG WANG, an individual dba “JADE HOUSE SEAFOOD & BBQ RESTAURANT”

1126 S. Diamond Bar Blvd Diamond Bar, CA 91765 [X] BY MAIL

[X] I deposited such envelope in the mail at Tustin, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.

[X] As follows: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Tustin, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. /s/ Pamela Tsao

Pamela Tsao

Case Details

Case Name: Hoang Minh Le v. Doe, dba Jade House Seafood and BBQ Restaurant
Court Name: District Court, C.D. California
Date Published: May 15, 2018
Docket Number: 5:16-cv-02271
Court Abbreviation: C.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.